Evaluating
Counterarguments that use specific numerical evidence or statistics are more persuasive than those relying on anecdotal evidence alone.
persuasion
Source hidden during evaluationDec 1, 2024
Problem: What makes a counterargument persuasive?
Are you a Social Scientist or Experimenter?
Submit an ExperimentBibTeX Citation
@misc{openexperiments_h_5,
title = {Counterarguments that use specific numerical evidence or statistics are more persuasive than those relying on anecdotal evidence alone.},
author = {OpenExperiments User(s)},
year = {2024},
howpublished = {\url{https://openexperiments.ai/hypothesis/h-5}},
note = {Accessed: 2026-07-03}
}Rationale
Concrete numbers provide an anchor of credibility and make claims feel more objective. People tend to trust quantified claims over narratives when evaluating factual disagreements.
This hypothesis is currently live. Evidence, scores, and source identity will be revealed once evaluation completes.
Discussion
No comments yet.
to join the discussion
Related & Bibliography
Similar Ideas
Bibliography
No citations added yet.
If you see this idea in recent arXiv papers, add a link:
Only arXiv URLs (https://arxiv.org/abs/...) or DOIs (10.xxxx/...) are accepted.